In recent years, movie popularity has shifted towards a unique genre, one that explores the lives of musical icons who have influenced generations. Music biopics, as they are called, are a blend of biography and musical storytelling, shedding light on the personal stories of beloved artists. This genre brings these artist’s journeys to the big screen in a way that’s digestible, entertaining and educational for the public. Films such as Bohemian Rhapsody, Elvis, and Rocketman have successfully combined history and entertainment. However, while the music biopic genre has earned significant commercial success, it has faced persistent criticism for its tendency to blur the line between fact and fiction. Where does that line get crossed, and why do so many people dislike them despite their success?
The roots of the music biopic genre stretch back to the 1940s with Alfred E. Green’s The Jolson Story (1946), which told the life of Lithuanian-American singer-songwriter Al Jolson. The film was a box-office hit and earned three Academy Awards for its soundtrack and score, establishing a foundation for future musical biopics. Films such as Selena (1997), starring Jennifer Lopez, further demonstrated the commercial potential of the genre. Selena grossed $11.6 million in its opening weekend and garnered acclaim for its portrayal of Selena Quintanilla-Pérez’s life, even winning American Latino Media Arts Awards.
In recent years the music biopic genre has become a box-office powerhouse. Bohemian Rhapsody (2018), which chronicled the life of Freddie Mercury and Queen, is one of the most successful biopics of all time, earning $910 million worldwide. Similarly, Elvis (2022) grossed $288 million globally, and Rocketman (2019), a musical biopic about Elton John, made $195 million. These films are not only financially successful but also critically acclaimed. Rami Malek won an Academy Award for his portrayal of Freddie Mercury in Bohemian Rhapsody, and Austin Butler received widespread praise for his performance in Elvis.
Streaming platforms such as Netflix and Hulu have also contributed to the genre’s rise, enabling biopics to reach niche audiences without relying solely on box office numbers. Films about lesser-known artists can now find new fans, bypassing the need for blockbuster success.
Despite their box-office triumphs, music biopics are often met with criticism. One of the most significant challenges filmmakers face when creating biopics is finding a balance between entertainment and accuracy. The question then becomes: how much truth can be bent in the name of storytelling before it becomes a distortion?
In Bohemian Rhapsody, for example, many events were dramatized or altered for narrative effect. Freddie Mercury’s relationship with manager Paul Prenter, portrayed by Allen Leech, was exaggerated to emphasize betrayal. Prenter, who sold private information about Mercury to the press, was depicted as a major antagonist, following a familiar biopic trope in which the artist or band’s manager becomes a villain. The film also significantly changed timelines to heighten the drama. While audiences flocked to theaters, many fans and critics took issue with these creative liberties.
Similarly, Rocketman , which told Elton John’s story, featured fantastical musical sequences that blurred the line between reality and imagination. While the film explored John’s struggles with addiction, it also incorporated moments of surrealism, leaving viewers unsure of what was factual and what was invented for theatrical purposes.
Another example of balancing entertainment and truth is Straight Outta Compton (2015), which grossed over $200 million. The film documented the rise of N.W.A. and their influence on the cultural revolution of the 1990s. While it was widely praised, some former group members and critics accused the filmmakers of glossing over controversial aspects, such as Dr. Dre’s treatment of women. In an effort to make the story more palatable for general audiences, certain complexities were downplayed or omitted entirely.
One reason biopics remain popular, despite their flaws, is their ability to introduce audiences to artists they may not have fully explored. Films such as Walk the Line (2005) about Johnny Cash and Ray (2004) about Ray Charles brought new fans to these legendary musicians. Both films earned Academy Awards and were praised for their in-depth exploration of each musician’s struggles with fame, addiction and personal demons. Yet, even these successful films had to condense the artist’s entire lives into a two-hour runtime, inevitably leaving out significant details or dramatizing others for effect.
Audiences are often drawn to music biopics because of the emotional resonance of the artist’s stories. There’s a certain appeal in witnessing the rise, fall and redemption of an artist or band. However, as the genre becomes more predictable, this very structure has turned into a formula. In many biopics, the story follows a familiar trajectory: an artist rises to fame, encounters personal or professional setbacks, and either overcomes them or falls from grace. Bohemian Rhapsody followed this arc closely, and many viewers complained of the predictability, especially in the way it depicted Mercury’s relationships and struggles.
Tropes involving the artist or band’s manager becoming the antagonist and the dramatic portrayal of inner conflicts have become staples of the genre. While these elements can add drama, they often come at the cost of authenticity. As audiences become more familiar with these conventions, the surprise and emotional impact begin to wane.
The ongoing debate surrounding music biopics centers on the balance between entertainment and authenticity. Filmmakers face a delicate challenge: Should they prioritize historical accuracy, even if it means telling a less exciting story? Or should they take creative liberties to create a more compelling narrative?
Elvis showcased this duality. Austin Butler’s portrayal of Elvis Presley was widely praised, and the film received accolades for its energetic and visually stunning sequences. However, some critics noted that certain aspects of Elvis’ life were either embellished or downplayed to make the story more glamorous. In contrast, Priscilla (2023), directed by Sofia Coppola, shifted the focus to Elvis’ wife, Priscilla Presley, offering a more nuanced and intimate perspective on their relationship. Coppola stated at the Venice Film Festival that her film aimed to tell Priscilla’s side of the story, offering a more balanced portrayal of Elvis’ life.
Despite the criticism, biopics continue to captivate audiences across generations, appealing to older fans who remember the music firsthand and younger viewers drawn in by discovery.
While biopics offer a unique blend of entertainment and insight into the lives of beloved musicians, maintaining the genre’s relevance and impact, filmmakers must strive for a better balance between storytelling and truth. By embracing authenticity without sacrificing compelling narratives, music biopics can continue to evolve and honor the legacy of the artists they portray. As the genre moves forward, the challenge will be to tell these stories with the depth, complexity, and respect they deserve, while still entertaining the masses.
In recent years, movie popularity has shifted towards a unique genre, one that explores the lives of musical icons who have influenced generations. Music biopics, as they are called, are a blend of biography and musical storytelling, shedding light on the personal stories of beloved artists. This genre brings these artist’s journeys to the big screen in a way that’s digestible, entertaining and educational for the public. Films such as Bohemian Rhapsody, Elvis, and Rocketman have successfully combined history and entertainment. However, while the music biopic genre has earned significant commercial success, it has faced persistent criticism for its tendency to blur the line between fact and fiction. Where does that line get crossed, and why do so many people dislike them despite their success?
The roots of the music biopic genre stretch back to the 1940s with Alfred E. Green’s The Jolson Story (1946), which told the life of Lithuanian-American singer-songwriter Al Jolson. The film was a box-office hit and earned three Academy Awards for its soundtrack and score, establishing a foundation for future musical biopics. Films such as Selena (1997), starring Jennifer Lopez, further demonstrated the commercial potential of the genre. Selena grossed $11.6 million in its opening weekend and garnered acclaim for its portrayal of Selena Quintanilla-Pérez’s life, even winning American Latino Media Arts Awards.
In recent years the music biopic genre has become a box-office powerhouse. Bohemian Rhapsody (2018), which chronicled the life of Freddie Mercury and Queen, is one of the most successful biopics of all time, earning $910 million worldwide. Similarly, Elvis (2022) grossed $288 million globally, and Rocketman (2019), a musical biopic about Elton John, made $195 million. These films are not only financially successful but also critically acclaimed. Rami Malek won an Academy Award for his portrayal of Freddie Mercury in Bohemian Rhapsody, and Austin Butler received widespread praise for his performance in Elvis.
Streaming platforms such as Netflix and Hulu have also contributed to the genre’s rise, enabling biopics to reach niche audiences without relying solely on box office numbers. Films about lesser-known artists can now find new fans, bypassing the need for blockbuster success.
Despite their box-office triumphs, music biopics are often met with criticism. One of the most significant challenges filmmakers face when creating biopics is finding a balance between entertainment and accuracy. The question then becomes: how much truth can be bent in the name of storytelling before it becomes a distortion?
In Bohemian Rhapsody, for example, many events were dramatized or altered for narrative effect. Freddie Mercury’s relationship with manager Paul Prenter, portrayed by Allen Leech, was exaggerated to emphasize betrayal. Prenter, who sold private information about Mercury to the press, was depicted as a major antagonist, following a familiar biopic trope in which the artist or band’s manager becomes a villain. The film also significantly changed timelines to heighten the drama. While audiences flocked to theaters, many fans and critics took issue with these creative liberties.
Similarly, Rocketman , which told Elton John’s story, featured fantastical musical sequences that blurred the line between reality and imagination. While the film explored John’s struggles with addiction, it also incorporated moments of surrealism, leaving viewers unsure of what was factual and what was invented for theatrical purposes.
Another example of balancing entertainment and truth is Straight Outta Compton (2015), which grossed over $200 million. The film documented the rise of N.W.A. and their influence on the cultural revolution of the 1990s. While it was widely praised, some former group members and critics accused the filmmakers of glossing over controversial aspects, such as Dr. Dre’s treatment of women. In an effort to make the story more palatable for general audiences, certain complexities were downplayed or omitted entirely.
One reason biopics remain popular, despite their flaws, is their ability to introduce audiences to artists they may not have fully explored. Films such as Walk the Line (2005) about Johnny Cash and Ray (2004) about Ray Charles brought new fans to these legendary musicians. Both films earned Academy Awards and were praised for their in-depth exploration of each musician’s struggles with fame, addiction and personal demons. Yet, even these successful films had to condense the artist’s entire lives into a two-hour runtime, inevitably leaving out significant details or dramatizing others for effect.
Audiences are often drawn to music biopics because of the emotional resonance of the artist’s stories. There’s a certain appeal in witnessing the rise, fall and redemption of an artist or band. However, as the genre becomes more predictable, this very structure has turned into a formula. In many biopics, the story follows a familiar trajectory: an artist rises to fame, encounters personal or professional setbacks, and either overcomes them or falls from grace. Bohemian Rhapsody followed this arc closely, and many viewers complained of the predictability, especially in the way it depicted Mercury’s relationships and struggles.
Tropes involving the artist or band’s manager becoming the antagonist and the dramatic portrayal of inner conflicts have become staples of the genre. While these elements can add drama, they often come at the cost of authenticity. As audiences become more familiar with these conventions, the surprise and emotional impact begin to wane.
The ongoing debate surrounding music biopics centers on the balance between entertainment and authenticity. Filmmakers face a delicate challenge: Should they prioritize historical accuracy, even if it means telling a less exciting story? Or should they take creative liberties to create a more compelling narrative?
Elvis showcased this duality. Austin Butler’s portrayal of Elvis Presley was widely praised, and the film received accolades for its energetic and visually stunning sequences. However, some critics noted that certain aspects of Elvis’ life were either embellished or downplayed to make the story more glamorous. In contrast, Priscilla (2023), directed by Sofia Coppola, shifted the focus to Elvis’ wife, Priscilla Presley, offering a more nuanced and intimate perspective on their relationship. Coppola stated at the Venice Film Festival that her film aimed to tell Priscilla’s side of the story, offering a more balanced portrayal of Elvis’ life.
Despite the criticism, biopics continue to captivate audiences across generations, appealing to older fans who remember the music firsthand and younger viewers drawn in by discovery.
While biopics offer a unique blend of entertainment and insight into the lives of beloved musicians, maintaining the genre’s relevance and impact, filmmakers must strive for a better balance between storytelling and truth. By embracing authenticity without sacrificing compelling narratives, music biopics can continue to evolve and honor the legacy of the artists they portray. As the genre moves forward, the challenge will be to tell these stories with the depth, complexity, and respect they deserve, while still entertaining the masses.
If you want to read more from our November issue, read the full issue online.
Or you can purchase a physical copy while supplies last.
